Future Earth: A Student Journal on Sustainability and Environment
Ambition vs Action Logo
Online ISSN 2819-7046 SPECIAL ISSUE: AMBITION VS ACTIONS 2026

COMMENTARY

China’s Economic Expansion and CO₂ Emissions: An IPAT Framework Analysis

KIKELOMO OLANIPEKUN

Thompson Rivers University

IPAT Framework Analysis: 2000–2022

The IPAT equation, expressed as Impact = Population × Affluence × Technology, is a useful framework for understanding how human activity drives environmental pressures. When applied to China, the model illustrates how demographic shifts, rapid economic growth, and technological advancements have impacted the country’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over the past two decades. As the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, China’s emissions trajectory is central to global climate action and sustainable development (Wang et al., 2021).

In 2022, China released approximately 11.5 billion metric tons of CO₂, accounting for about 30% of global emissions (Climate Watch, 2023). While China leads in total emissions, its per capita emissions remain lower than those of the United States. Between 2000 and 2020, China’s population grew from approximately 1.26 billion to 1.41 billion (World Bank, 2023). However, population growth has slowed sharply in recent years due to the long-term effects of the one-child policy, declining fertility rates, and rapid urbanisation (United Nations, 2023; World Bank, 2023). By 2022, population growth had largely stalled, with early signs of population decline beginning to emerge (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2023). This slowing demographic growth in China has eased some of the upward pressure on emissions, while rapid urbanization continues to concentrate energy use in cities and can increase carbon intensity (Pan et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2024).

China’s economic rise has been dramatic. GDP per capita jumped from around $950 in 2000 to more than $12,700 in 2022 (Ritchie et al., 2023), representing a more than thirteenfold increase. However, higher incomes have driven increased demand for energy-intensive goods and services, including automobiles, air conditioning, meat consumption, and international travel. The massive scale of manufacturing and infrastructure development has also driven up emissions (Pan et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2024). Between 2000 and 2013, China’s GHG emissions more than doubled, largely due to the energy requirements of rapid growth and economic expansion (IEA, 2023).

Within the IPAT model, “technology” reflects the carbon intensity of economic activity, or the amount of CO₂ emitted per unit of GDP. Since 2005, China has steadily reduced its carbon intensity through large-scale investments in renewable energy, stricter efficiency standards, and a gradual shift away from coal (IEA, 2023).

Line graph showing trends in China’s IPAT components from 2000 to 2023, indexed to 2000 = 100. GDP per capita (affluence) rises sharply to nearly 600 by 2023. Total greenhouse gas emissions increase more moderately to just above 300. Population grows slightly to about 112. Carbon intensity steadily declines to roughly 45, indicating improved emissions efficiency despite rising total emissions.

Figure 1. Pattern of IPAT Components in China (2000–2023). Graph generated by ChatGPT using Python (OpenAI, 2025).

China now leads the world in the production and deployment of solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles (Climate Watch, 2023). The country has also expanded national energy-efficiency programs and launched a nationwide emissions trading system. As a result, China’s carbon intensity has declined by more than 50% since 2005, dropping from 2005 levels to about 0.42 kg of CO₂ per dollar of GDP by 2022 (World Bank, 2023; IEA, 2023). Still, coal continues to account for more than half of China’s energy supply, and new coal-fired power plants are still under development (International Energy Agency [IEA], 2025). This reliance on coal slows the pace at which technology gains can counterbalance emissions growth generated by rising affluence.

The IPAT model helps explain China’s emissions trajectory over the past two decades. Affluence, driven by rapid economic expansion, has exerted the strongest upward pressure on emissions, while technology has increasingly pushed emissions in the opposite direction through large-scale renewable energy deployment, industrial efficiency improvements, and declining carbon intensity (IEA, 2023; Climate Action Tracker, 2024). Population, once a major driver, has become less significant as China’s demographic growth slows and begins to decline (World Bank, 2023). This combination has created a delicate balance in which emissions growth has slowed but remains high overall.

Under its climate commitments, China aims to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060 and has introduced its first absolute emissions-reduction target, seeking to cut total net greenhouse gas emissions by 7–10% from peak levels by 2035 (Climate Action Tracker, 2024). Table 1 illustrates the slowdown of GHG emissions from 5.6% to 3.2% annually following the Paris Agreement. While this trend is encouraging, it may also reflect slower growth in affluence and population, since this period includes the COVID-19 pandemic.

Period Population Growth GDP per Capita Growth (PPP 2017 $) Carbon Intensity Total GHG Emissions (excl. LULUCF)
2000–2015 +0.7  +9.2 –3.8 +5.6
2016–2022 +0.3% +6.7 –5.1 +3.2
Table 1: China’s IPAT Components, 2000–2022 (Average Annual Percentage Change)

Note. Values represent average annual percentage change. GDP per capita is measured in constant 2017 international dollars (purchasing power parity, PPP). Carbon intensity refers to CO₂ emissions per unit of GDP. Total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions exclude land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF).
Source. World Bank, World Development Indicators (2023). 

In conclusion, China’s experience highlights the challenge of balancing economic development with environmental sustainability. The IPAT and Kaya frameworks reveal that affluence and technology are the most influential drivers of emissions trends. With population growth nearly flat, future emissions reductions will depend largely on China’s ability to further decouple economic growth from carbon output.


Acknowledgment

I extend my sincere gratitude to my instructors and peers for their guidance throughout this analysis. Their constructive feedback and encouragement have been invaluable in shaping the clarity, structure, and overall quality of this work. I also acknowledge the published data sources consulted, which provided essential context for examining trends in population, affluence, technology, and greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, I benefited from online discussions and chat-based guidance that supported the refinement of interpretations and the organization of results.


Media Attribution

Figure 1. was created using ChatGPT using Python (OpenAI, 2025), in compliance with the OpenAI Terms of Use.


References

Climate Action Tracker. (2024). China country assessment: Targets and pathways. Climate Analytics & New Climate Institute. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china/

Climate Watch. (2023). GHG emissions data: China. World Resources Institute. https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?locations=CHN

International Energy Agency. (2023). China energy profile.   https://www.iea.org/countries/china

International Energy Agency. (2025). China — Energy mix.  https://www.iea.org/countries/china/energy-mix

National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2023, February 23). Statistical communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the 2022 national economic and social development [Press Release]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202302/t20230227_1918979.html

Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02162-4

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (GPT-5) [Large language model]. OpenAI. https://chat.openai.com

Pan, C., et al. (2021, March). How do the population structure changes of China affect its carbon emissions? An empirical study based on ridge regression analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13(6), 3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063319

Ritchie, H., Roser, M., & Rosado, P. (2023). GDP per capita. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-worldbank?country=~CHN

Streets, D., Jiang, K., Hu, X., Sinton, J., Zhang, X., Xu, D., Jacobson, M., & Hansen, J. (2001). Recent reductions in China's greenhouse gas emissions. Science, 294, 1835–1837. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065226

Sugar, L., Kennedy, C., & Leman, E. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions from Chinese cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(4) ,Special Issue: Greening Growing Giants, August 2012, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00481.x

Tang, L., et al. (2024). Assessing the impacts of fertility and retirement policies on China’s carbon emissions. Nature Climate Change, 14, 1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02162-4

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). World population prospects 2022.

Wang, Y., & others. (2021). Carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China: Goals, key factors and policy implications. Environmental Science & Ecotechnology, 6, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2021.100113 ScienceDirect

World Bank. (2023). Population data: China. World Development Indicator.

Worldometer. (2023). China CO₂ emissions. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/china-co2-emissions/

Yuan, W., Liang, M., Gao, Y., Huang, L., Dan, L., Duan, H., Hong, S., Jiang, F., Ju, W., Li, T., Lou, Z., Luan, S., Lu, X., Qin, Z., Ran, L., Shen, L., Teng, F., Tian, X., Wang, Y., Wei, J., Xia, J., Xia, X., Yu, L., Yue, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., Zhu, Q., Piao, S., & Wang, X. (2025). China's greenhouse gas budget during 2000–2023. National Science Review, 12. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaf069

Zheng, J., Mi, Z., Coffman, D., Milcheva, S., Shan, Y., Guan, D., & Wang, S. (2019). Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003

Zheng, X., Lu, Y., Yuan, J., Baninla, Y., Zhang, S., Stenseth, N., Hessen, D., Tian, H., Obersteiner, M., & Chen, D. (2019). Drivers of change in China’s energy-related CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 29 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908513117


Author

Kikelomo Olanipekun’s academic and professional journey began with a background in Agricultural Economics and early work experience as an agronomist. Through her work in agricultural systems, she developed firsthand insight into how land, people, and policy shape one another. Those years working closely with farmers and agricultural systems sparked a deeper curiosity about sustainability, resource management, and the economic forces that influence who thrives and who struggles within rural and agricultural contexts. This intellectual curiosity eventually led her to Thompson Rivers University, where she is currently studying Environmental Economics and Management. Today, she brings practical agricultural experience and analytical training to explore how communities can transition toward cleaner, fairer, and more resilient systems. Her work is rooted in a belief that sustainability isn’t merely a theoretical construct, but a lived and negotiated process and built from the ground up.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license